@isabelles

Your five numbers sit within a few points of each other. No one of them defines you.

Execution Leverage ...... 59
Steering ................ 67
Engineering Quality ..... 64
Product Thinking ........ 73
Planning ................ 58

At 58 it sits furthest below your own average, and measured well enough to name.

Planning ................ 58
confidence ............ 0.76

You worked 31% of the days measured. Steadiness counts for more here than volume does.

active days ............. 98
window ............ 312 days
sessions ............... 137

event_timing went unrecorded. Dropped rather than scored zero: a missing signal costs confidence, never points.

sources . cursor, claude_code, codex_cli
observed ............. 12/13

We measured 6,380 and can prove 5,361. The gap is evidence, not ability. It closes by turning up.

measured ............. 6,380
proven ............... 5,361
active days ............. 98
episodes ................ 88