@kbj · 4,961 of 10,000

Builder

@kbj

claude_code · cursor

Generalist

Proof score

4,961

of 10,000

Rank

of 5 ranked

Too few builders to compute a percentile yet.

49Execution LeverageHow effectively is intent turned into completed work?0.79 moderate confidence

58SteeringHow effectively is the AI directed and corrected?0.79 moderate confidence

46Engineering QualityHow sound is the engineering process and output?0.79 moderate confidence

52Product ThinkingIs there reasoning about what should be built?0.55 low confidence

44PlanningIs work structured before execution?0.79 moderate confidence

✓Sessions analyzedneeds evidence of real work · has 83 sessions

✓Depth of evidenceneeds 12 episodes' worth · has 17.5 episodes' worth

✓Active daysneeds 8 active days · has 41 active days

✓Evidence confidenceneeds 0.65 minimum · has 0.79

✓Evidence checksneeds consistent and plausible · has passed

v2.0 · 2026-09-18

Cards

IDENTITY

Generalist

Your five numbers sit within a few points of each other. No one of them defines you.

Execution Leverage ...... 49
Steering ................ 58
Engineering Quality ..... 46
Product Thinking ........ 52
Planning ................ 44

IDENTITY

PlanningPlanning

At 44 it sits furthest below your own average, and measured well enough to name.

Planning ................ 44
confidence ............ 0.79

RHYTHM

41 of 45 days

You worked 91% of the days measured. Steadiness counts for more here than volume does.

active days ............. 41
window ............. 45 days
sessions ................ 83

MEASUREMENT

13 of 13 signals

Your tools recorded every signal we can read. Nothing was dropped for being invisible.

sources . claude_code, cursor
observed ............. 13/13

Macintosh 128K photograph by Grm wnr, from an All About Apple Museum original, CC BY-SA 3.0, modified. Departure Mono and Overused Grotesk, SIL OFL.