@aisyahn

Your five numbers sit within a few points of each other. No one of them defines you.

Execution Leverage ...... 62
Steering ................ 55
Engineering Quality ..... 60
Product Thinking ........ 64
Planning ................ 49

At 49 it sits furthest below your own average, and measured well enough to name.

Planning ................ 49
confidence ............ 0.65

You worked 26% of the days measured. Steadiness counts for more here than volume does.

active days ............. 65
window ............ 248 days
sessions ................ 94

plan_mode, model, timestamps and 1 more went unrecorded. Dropped rather than scored zero: a missing signal costs confidence, never points.

sources . cursor, claude_code
observed .............. 9/13

We measured 5,845 and can prove 4,513. The gap is evidence, not ability. It closes by turning up.

measured ............. 5,845
proven ............... 4,513
active days ............. 65
episodes ................ 60